Asylum Grant Rate
34.6% of merits decisions
Asylum cases decided at Charlotte Immigration Court
Immigration court · Charlotte, NC
34.6% asylum grant rate across 11,503 merits decisions (FY2015–2025) - below the 48.2% national average.
Data updated 2026-06-21
The verdict
The Charlotte Immigration Court granted asylum in 34.6% of the 11,503 cases it decided on the merits - below the 48.2% national rate.
The Charlotte Immigration Court, based in Charlotte, NC, decided 11,503 asylum cases on the merits between FY2015 and FY2025 - out of 281,852 total proceedings of all case types it handled. Of those asylum decisions, 3,982 were granted (34.6%) and 7,521 were denied (65.4%). The court has 28 immigration judges with enough asylum decisions to report, whose individual grant rates shape the court-wide average shown above.
Between fiscal year 2015 and fiscal year 2025, the grant rate at Charlotte Immigration Court rose by 7.4 percentage points, moving from 30.3% to 37.7%. That window spans 11 fiscal years of reported data, covering shifts in bench composition, policy guidance, and nationality mix. The year-by-year table lower on this page shows the underlying annual case volume for every year in the series.
Outcomes vary substantially judge-to-judge. Judge JRN decided the most asylum cases here - 1,201 merits decisions (44.6% grant rate). The spread between the highest-grant and lowest-grant judges at this court is 88.4 percentage points - AAB at 91.0% versus DDW at 2.6%. These differences reflect case mix, nationality assignments, and docket type rather than any single factor, and they are why EOIR cautions readers against treating any judge's rate as predictive of an individual case.
Asylum Grant Rate
34.6% of merits decisions
Asylum cases decided at Charlotte Immigration Court
Pending Cases
112,726
Open proceedings (all case types)
Asylum Decisions
11,503
Merits decisions, FY2015–2025
Asylum grant rate by fiscal year at Charlotte Immigration Court.
| Fiscal year | Decisions | Grant rate |
|---|---|---|
| FY2015 | 231 | 30.3% |
| FY2016 | 355 | 25.6% |
| FY2017 | 422 | 25.4% |
| FY2018 | 931 | 18.4% |
| FY2019 | 1,071 | 25.1% |
| FY2020 | 532 | 33.5% |
| FY2021 | 635 | 28.7% |
| FY2022 | 632 | 37.0% |
| FY2023 | 997 | 41.9% |
| FY2024 | 1,195 | 47.1% |
| FY2025 | 4,502 | 37.7% |
28 judges with enough asylum decisions to report. Grant rates run from 91.0% (89 decisions) down to 2.6% (77 decisions) - a 88.4-point spread on the same bench. Rates based on smaller decision counts carry more statistical noise.
Judge names below are the anonymized judge codes EOIR assigns in its public case-data release, not verified public identities. EOIR does not publish immigration judges' full names in this dataset. See our methodology for detail.
| # | Judge | Decisions | Asylum grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Judge AAB | 89 | |
| 2 | Judge SC2 | 857 | |
| 3 | Judge CB1 | 129 | |
| 4 | Judge MLE | 781 | |
| 5 | Judge JRN | 1,201 | |
| 6 | Judge THS | 815 | |
| 7 | Judge ATL | 910 | |
| 8 | Judge MNS | 403 | |
| 9 | Judge RHC | 827 | |
| 10 | Judge JAL | 120 | |
| 11 | Judge DKJ | 172 | |
| 12 | Judge ZRA | 442 | |
| 13 | Judge CNP | 154 | |
| 14 | Judge GWR | 691 | |
| 15 | Judge KAR | 257 | |
| 16 | Judge VSM | 41 | |
| 17 | Judge BJP | 825 | |
| 18 | Judge VSC | 817 | |
| 19 | Judge BTP | 398 | |
| 20 | Judge LDC | 202 | |
| 21 | Judge JGH | 249 | |
| 22 | Judge SNS | 134 | |
| 23 | Judge JBT | 312 | |
| 24 | Judge RML | 148 | |
| 25 | Judge GJW | 156 | |
| 26 | Judge NAM | 152 | |
| 27 | Judge JNK | 79 | |
| 28 | Judge DDW | 77 | |
Data from the DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) via FOIA bulk case data. Statistical information only, not legal advice.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Source: U.S. EOIR, Immigration Court Statistics Immigration court outcomes by court and case type · 2025
Every figure on PlainImmigration is rendered directly from federal immigration court records, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on DOJ EOIR case-level records, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.