Asylum Grant Rate
23.6% of merits decisions
Asylum cases decided at Pearsall Immigration Court
Courts → Pearsall, TX
Immigration court · Pearsall, TX
Pearsall Immigration Court
23.6% asylum grant rate across 4,479 merits decisions (FY2015–2025) - below the 48.2% national average.
Data updated 2026-06-21
- 23.6%
- Asylum grant rate
- 76.4%
- Asylum denial rate
- 173
- Pending cases
- 4 mo
- Time to decision
The verdict
The Pearsall Immigration Court granted asylum in 23.6% of the 4,479 cases it decided on the merits - below the 48.2% national rate.
- 23.6%
- Asylum grant rate
- 4,479
- Merits decisions, FY2015–2025
- 22
- Judges with reported asylum decisions
- 173
- Pending cases (all types)
Statistical data only. Grant rates reflect historical case outcomes and are not predictive of any individual case result.
Consult a licensed immigration attorney for legal advice.
Case Insights: Pearsall Immigration Court
The Pearsall Immigration Court, based in Pearsall, TX, decided 4,479 asylum cases on the merits between FY2015 and FY2025 - out of 192,904 total proceedings of all case types it handled. Of those asylum decisions, 1,057 were granted (23.6%) and 3,422 were denied (76.4%). The court has 22 immigration judges with enough asylum decisions to report, whose individual grant rates shape the court-wide average shown above.
Between fiscal year 2015 and fiscal year 2025, the grant rate at Pearsall Immigration Court fell by 28.1 percentage points, moving from 37.7% to 9.6%. That window spans 11 fiscal years of reported data, covering shifts in bench composition, policy guidance, and nationality mix. The year-by-year table lower on this page shows the underlying annual case volume for every year in the series.
Outcomes vary substantially judge-to-judge. Judge RRM decided the most asylum cases here - 677 merits decisions (17.6% grant rate). The spread between the highest-grant and lowest-grant judges at this court is 82.3 percentage points - MB at 82.3% versus DKJ at 0.0%. These differences reflect case mix, nationality assignments, and docket type rather than any single factor, and they are why EOIR cautions readers against treating any judge's rate as predictive of an individual case.
23.6%
Asylum Grant Rate
76.4%
Asylum Denial Rate
4,479
Asylum Decisions
4 mo
Avg Time to Decision
Pending Cases
173
Open proceedings (all case types)
Asylum Decisions
4,479
Merits decisions, FY2015–2025
Grant rate over time
Asylum grant rate by fiscal year at Pearsall Immigration Court.
| Fiscal year | Decisions | Grant rate |
|---|---|---|
| FY2015 | 453 | 37.7% |
| FY2016 | 283 | 43.1% |
| FY2017 | 371 | 27.2% |
| FY2018 | 384 | 26.8% |
| FY2019 | 362 | 26.8% |
| FY2020 | 733 | 23.5% |
| FY2021 | 229 | 48.5% |
| FY2022 | 145 | 24.1% |
| FY2023 | 359 | 13.1% |
| FY2024 | 432 | 6.5% |
| FY2025 | 728 | 9.6% |
The judge lottery at Pearsall Immigration Court
22 judges with enough asylum decisions to report. Grant rates run from 82.3% (79 decisions) down to 0.0% (25 decisions) - a 82.3-point spread on the same bench. Rates based on smaller decision counts carry more statistical noise.
Judge names below are the anonymized judge codes EOIR assigns in its public case-data release, not verified public identities. EOIR does not publish immigration judges' full names in this dataset. See our methodology for detail.
| # | Judge | Decisions | Asylum grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Judge MB | 79 | |
| 2 | Judge GPM | 59 | |
| 3 | Judge RSN | 27 | |
| 4 | Judge CAH | 94 | |
| 5 | Judge DHF | 204 | |
| 6 | Judge EJT | 199 | |
| 7 | Judge DJS | 79 | |
| 8 | Judge TGC | 219 | |
| 9 | Judge ADM | 105 | |
| 10 | Judge MBT | 329 | |
| 11 | Judge EMZ | 153 | |
| 12 | Judge MGM | 27 | |
| 13 | Judge SDA | 653 | |
| 14 | Judge CNM | 64 | |
| 15 | Judge WLP | 445 | |
| 16 | Judge RRM | 677 | |
| 17 | Judge JA1 | 106 | |
| 18 | Judge VMS | 208 | |
| 19 | Judge KNT | 211 | |
| 20 | Judge DML | 36 | |
| 21 | Judge SSL | 44 | |
| 22 | Judge DKJ | 25 | |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the grant rate at the Pearsall Immigration Court immigration court? ▼
The Pearsall Immigration Court immigration court has an overall grant rate of 23.6% and a denial rate of 76.4%, based on 4,479 asylum merits decisions (FY2015–2025) from DOJ EOIR records.
How many immigration judges serve at Pearsall Immigration Court? ▼
Pearsall Immigration Court has 22 immigration judges on record. Grant rates vary significantly between judges, from 0.0% to 82.3%.
How long do cases take at Pearsall Immigration Court? ▼
The average wait time at Pearsall Immigration Court is approximately 4 months. Wait times vary based on case type, docket load, and whether continuances are granted.
Where is the Pearsall Immigration Court immigration court located? ▼
The Pearsall Immigration Court immigration court is located in Pearsall, TX. It is part of the DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) system.
Does the grant rate predict my case outcome at Pearsall Immigration Court? ▼
No. Grant rates are historical averages reflecting aggregate outcomes across all case types and judges. Individual outcomes depend on the specific facts of each case, the judge assigned, the type of relief sought, and whether you have legal representation. Always consult a licensed immigration attorney.
How has the Pearsall Immigration Court grant rate changed over time? ▼
Between FY2015 and FY2025, the grant rate at Pearsall Immigration Court decreased from 37.7% to 9.6%. Year-by-year data is shown in the trends table on this page.
Explore PlainImmigration
Data from the DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) via FOIA bulk case data. Statistical information only, not legal advice.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Source: U.S. EOIR, Immigration Court Statistics Immigration court outcomes by court and case type · 2025
Every figure on PlainImmigration is rendered directly from federal immigration court records, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on DOJ EOIR case-level records, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.