Immigration judge · Chelmsford Immigration Court (Detained)

Immigration Judge HAK

36.2% asylum grant rate across 94 merits decisions - below the 48.2% national average.

Data updated 2026-06-21

36.2%
Asylum grant rate
63.8%
Asylum denial rate
94
Asylum decisions

"HAK" is the anonymized judge code DOJ's Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) assigns in its public case-data release, not a verified public identity. EOIR does not publish immigration judges' full names in this dataset, so this code should not be read as confirming, or attributing these statistics to, any specific named individual. See our methodology for detail.

The verdict

Judge HAK granted asylum in 36.2% of the 94 cases decided on the merits at the Chelmsford Immigration Court (Detained) - below the 48.2% national rate.

36.2%
Asylum grant rate
63.8%
Asylum denial rate
94
Merits decisions, FY2015–2025
Statistical data only. Individual judge grant rates reflect historical case outcomes, case mix, nationalities handled, and legal representation rates all affect these numbers. This is not a prediction for any future case. Consult a licensed immigration attorney.

Case Insights: Judge HAK

Immigration Judge HAK decided 94 asylum cases on the merits at the Chelmsford Immigration Court (Detained) between FY2015 and FY2025. Of those, 34 were granted (36.2%) and 60 were denied (63.8%). That volume places Judge HAK among a lighter caseload at the Chelmsford Immigration Court (Detained).

The gap between the grant rate and the denial rate is -27.6 percentage points, which categorizes this judge's outcome pattern as denial-leaning relative to national EOIR norms. Because every case before an immigration judge depends on nationality, relief type, representation status, and country conditions, these aggregate rates are not a predictor of any single future decision. TRAC Immigration and DOJ EOIR both caution readers to interpret judge-level rates as descriptive rather than prescriptive statistics.

The Chelmsford Immigration Court (Detained) itself has multiple judges whose grant rates can vary widely, so the best way to contextualize Judge HAK's numbers is to compare against court-wide figures and against peers on the same bench. The court page for Chelmsford Immigration Court (Detained) lists all sitting judges and their asylum grant rates, making side-by-side comparison of decision volumes and grant percentages straightforward for researchers, attorneys, and respondents.

Judges With a Similar Grant Rate

These are the immigration judges nationwide whose asylum grant rate is closest to Judge HAK's 36.2%, regardless of court.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Judge HAK's grant rate?
Immigration Judge HAK has an overall grant rate of 36.2% across 94 decisions at the Chelmsford Immigration Court (Detained). The denial rate is 63.8%.
Where does Judge HAK serve?
Judge HAK serves at the Chelmsford Immigration Court (Detained). You can view all judges and court-wide statistics on the court page.
How many cases has Judge HAK decided?
Judge HAK has decided 94 cases on record in DOJ EOIR data, including 34 grants and 60 denials.
Does a judge's grant rate predict my case outcome?
No. A judge's historical grant rate reflects aggregate outcomes across many different case types, nationalities, and circumstances. Individual outcomes depend on the facts of your case, the type of relief sought, country conditions, and the quality of legal representation. Always consult a licensed immigration attorney.

Explore PlainImmigration

Data from the DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) via FOIA bulk case data. Statistical information only, not legal advice.

Data sourced from DOJ EOIR Immigration Court Case Data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainImmigration Editorial

Every figure on PlainImmigration is rendered directly from federal immigration court records, no number is typed in by an editor. Judge statistics are computed directly from DOJ EOIR case-level records, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.