Immigration judge · Port Isabel Immigration Court

Immigration Judge HEA

According to the DOJ EOIR FOIA release (vintage 2026-08), signature read: denial rate 85.1% is Judge HEA's most extreme outcome share in the corpus. Grant rate sits in the lower third of tracked IJs at 14.9% (below the 48.3% national average). Merits volume is thin-corpus at 87 decisions FY2015–2025.

Data updated 2026-09-05

14.9%
Asylum grant rate
85.1%
Asylum denial rate
87
Asylum decisions

Judge HEA in one line

Judge HEA's asylum grant rate is 14.9% (lower-third grant rate, below the 48.3% national average) across 87 FY2015-2025 merits decisions (thin-corpus volume).

14.9%
Asylum grant rate · Lower-third grant rate
87
Merits decisions · Thin-corpus volume
-33.4 pp
vs. national average
View watchlist

"HEA" is the anonymized judge code DOJ's Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) assigns in its public case-data release, not a verified public identity. EOIR does not publish immigration judges' full names in this dataset, so this code should not be read as confirming, or attributing these statistics to, any specific named individual. See our methodology for detail.

Statistical data only. Judge HEA's 85.1% denial-leaning history often tracks case mix and representation gaps, not a forecast for a future merits hearing. Consult a licensed immigration attorney.

Judge HEA vs all tracked IJs by asylum grant rate

Where this judge's FY2015–2025 asylum grant rate sits among every tracked immigration judge (a leniency measure, not a quality ranking)

14.9% 1468th of 1696 higher than 228 of 1,696 judges

Immigration judges, banded by asylum grant rate

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more judges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source DOJ EOIR asylum merits decisions · FY2015–2025

Year-by-Year Outcomes

Historical asylum merits decisions for this anonymized EOIR judge code. Annual rows can be thin, and are not a forecast of any future case.

FY Decisions Grants Denials Grant %
2015 77 12 65 15.6%
2016 8 1 7 12.5%
2017 1 0 1 0.0%
2018 1 0 1 0.0%

IJ rate-band chamber

Anonymized codes nearest Judge HEA's grant rate

This chamber tracks nationwide IJs nearest Judge HEA's 14.9% grant rate, a lower-third corpus rate, with THIN/LIGHT/FULL/HEAVY merits stamps on each peer row.

1,695 other immigration judges nationwide have a tracked asylum grant rate; the 6 closest matches to Judge HEA are shown here.

IJ Grant Δ vs here Merits Stamp Court
DLC 14.9% same 148 LIGHT Laredo
SEG 14.8% -0.1 pp 263 LIGHT Conroe
ROA 14.8% -0.1 pp 155 LIGHT Los Angeles - N. Los Angeles Street
ARD 15.0% +0.1 pp 133 LIGHT Adelanto
ARA 14.8% -0.1 pp 27 THIN Elizabeth
JCL 14.8% -0.1 pp 27 THIN Annandale

Same-bench poles at Port Isabel

Same-bench spread at Port Isabel: Judge HEA runs 14.9% - below the 48.3% national average among IJs with at least 20 merits here.

Nationwide judges with similar asylum caseload

Other thin-volume IJ codes nationwide, caseload peers when merits counts sit below the corpus median.

  • IJ RCH · Elizabeth Immigration Court · 87 merits · 10.3% grant
  • IJ EBW · Stewart Immigration Court · 88 merits · 3.4% grant
  • IJ CPH · Sacramento Immigration Court · 86 merits · 40.7% grant
  • IJ SJC · LaSalle Immigration Court (Jena) · 88 merits · 45.5% grant

Lower-third grant-rate IJ code HEA (14.9%) in DOJ EOIR FOIA data. Statistical information only, not legal advice.

DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) FOIA bulk case data for IJ HEA at Port Isabel Immigration Court; asylum denial rate 85.1%. PlainImmigration computed grant/denial aggregates FY2015–FY2025; Merits volume is thin-corpus at 87 decisions FY2015–2025.

Judge HEA's figures are computed from EOIR case-level records - asylum denial rate 85.1%, not hand-typed editorial values. justice.gov/eoir/foia-library-0

Every figure on PlainImmigration is rendered directly from federal immigration court records, no number is typed in by an editor. Judge HEA's grant/denial/merits figures are recomputed live from the EOIR case-level extract on every request, never hand-typed. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-09-05.