Immigration judge · LaSalle Immigration Court (Jena)

Immigration Judge FPO

According to the DOJ EOIR FOIA release (vintage 2026-08), signature read: 68 merits decisions make Judge FPO a thin-volume IJ code in the FOIA release. Grant rate sits mid-corpus at 38.2% (below the 48.3% national average).

Data updated 2026-09-05

38.2%
Asylum grant rate
61.8%
Asylum denial rate
68
Asylum decisions

Judge FPO in one line

Judge FPO's asylum grant rate is 38.2% (mid-band grant rate, below the 48.3% national average) across 68 FY2015-2025 merits decisions (thin-corpus volume).

38.2%
Asylum grant rate · Mid-band grant rate
68
Merits decisions · Thin-corpus volume
-10.1 pp
vs. national average
View watchlist

"FPO" is the anonymized judge code DOJ's Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) assigns in its public case-data release, not a verified public identity. EOIR does not publish immigration judges' full names in this dataset, so this code should not be read as confirming, or attributing these statistics to, any specific named individual. See our methodology for detail.

Statistical data only. Judge FPO's 61.8% denial-leaning history often tracks case mix and representation gaps, not a forecast for a future merits hearing. Consult a licensed immigration attorney.

Judge FPO vs all tracked IJs by asylum grant rate

Where this judge's FY2015–2025 asylum grant rate sits among every tracked immigration judge (a leniency measure, not a quality ranking)

38.2% 901st of 1696 higher than 795 of 1,696 judges

Immigration judges, banded by asylum grant rate

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more judges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source DOJ EOIR asylum merits decisions · FY2015–2025

Year-by-Year Outcomes

Historical asylum merits decisions for this anonymized EOIR judge code. Annual rows can be thin, and are not a forecast of any future case.

FY Decisions Grants Denials Grant %
2020 64 23 41 35.9%
2021 4 3 1 75.0%

IJ rate-band chamber

Anonymized codes nearest Judge FPO's grant rate

EOIR publishes immigration judges as three-letter codes, not names. This chamber lists nationwide IJs whose asylum grant rate is closest to 38.2% (ABS gap), with a merits-volume stamp so volume is visible without a second identical card grid.

1,695 other immigration judges nationwide have a tracked asylum grant rate; the 6 closest matches to Judge FPO are shown here.

IJ Grant Δ vs here Merits Stamp Court
MWC 38.2% same 594 FULL Santa Ana
JWO 38.3% +0.1 pp 562 FULL Los Angeles - West
HDA 38.3% +0.1 pp 360 LIGHT Conroe
JNP 38.1% -0.1 pp 819 FULL Sterling
JSI 38.4% +0.2 pp 177 LIGHT Phoenix
JEP 38.4% +0.2 pp 138 LIGHT Miami

Same-bench poles at LaSalle

Same-bench spread at LaSalle: Judge FPO runs 38.2% - below the 48.3% national average among IJs with at least 20 merits here.

Nationwide judges with similar asylum caseload

Other thin-volume IJ codes nationwide, caseload peers when merits counts sit below the corpus median.

  • IJ NYG · Boston Immigration Court · 68 merits · 33.8% grant
  • IJ KAR · Elizabeth Immigration Court · 68 merits · 16.2% grant
  • IJ ERT · Otero Immigration Court · 68 merits · 63.2% grant
  • IJ SNM · Adelanto Immigration Court · 68 merits · 11.8% grant

Data from DOJ EOIR FOIA bulk case data for Judge FPO at LaSalle Immigration Court (Jena). Statistical information only, not legal advice.

DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) FOIA bulk case data for IJ FPO at LaSalle Immigration Court (Jena); merits-decision volume 68. PlainImmigration computed grant/denial aggregates FY2015–FY2025; Merits volume is thin-corpus at 68 decisions FY2015–2025.

Judge FPO's figures are computed from EOIR case-level records - merits-decision volume 68, not hand-typed editorial values. justice.gov/eoir/foia-library-0

Every figure on PlainImmigration is rendered directly from federal immigration court records, no number is typed in by an editor. Judge FPO's grant/denial/merits figures are recomputed live from the EOIR case-level extract on every request, never hand-typed. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-09-05.