Courts
2024 data Public-data reference. official source

JNA

Open-data reference.

, · DOJ EOIR Immigration Court

Statistical data only. Grant rates reflect historical case outcomes and are not predictive of any individual case result. Consult a licensed immigration attorney for legal advice.

Case Insights: JNA

The JNA immigration court, based in , , has processed 54,512 recorded cases in the DOJ EOIR dataset. Of those, 35,520 resulted in relief granted (65.2%), 826 were denied (1.5%), and 18,166 fell into other dispositions such as administrative closures, changes of venue, or withdrawals (33.3%). The court has 76 immigration judges on record, whose individual caseloads and outcome patterns shape the court-wide averages shown above.

Between fiscal year 2015 and fiscal year 2025, the grant rate at JNA rose by 3.9 percentage points, moving from 66.1% to 70.0%. That window spans 11 fiscal years of reported data, covering shifts in bench composition, policy guidance, and nationality mix. The year-by-year table lower on this page shows the underlying annual case volume for every year in the series.

Outcomes vary substantially judge-to-judge. Judge AMS has the largest recorded caseload at 3,749 decisions (58.2% grant rate). The spread between the highest-grant and lowest-grant judges at this court is 80.2 percentage points — FTP at 98.2% versus JVJ at 18.0%. These differences reflect case mix, nationality assignments, and docket type rather than any single factor, and they are why EOIR cautions readers against treating any judge's rate as predictive of an individual case.

65.2%
Grant Rate
1.5%
Denial Rate
0 mo
Avg Wait Time
54,512
Total Cases

Case Outcomes at JNA — Distribution of 54,512 total cases

Grants35520Denials826Other18166
Case Outcomes at JNA — Distribution of 54,512 total cases

Grant Rate

65.2% of cases

Decided cases at JNA

Avg Wait Time

0 months

From NTA to decision

Total Decisions

54,512

All completed cases

Court Grant Rate vs. National Average 65.2%

65.2% of cases granted relief at JNA

Judges (76)

AMS
3,749 decisions
58.2%
grant rate
KKR
3,680 decisions
68.4%
grant rate
JAD
2,608 decisions
63.4%
grant rate
CAT
2,466 decisions
46.6%
grant rate
ALR
2,059 decisions
58.0%
grant rate
SBF
1,995 decisions
42.5%
grant rate
PJE
1,802 decisions
50.1%
grant rate
JEC
1,777 decisions
57.3%
grant rate
JAM
1,679 decisions
81.2%
grant rate
BHL
1,656 decisions
68.1%
grant rate
MEG
1,615 decisions
65.8%
grant rate
JBS
1,449 decisions
61.4%
grant rate
ALD
1,131 decisions
74.4%
grant rate
GAC
1,100 decisions
65.1%
grant rate
FSM
1,072 decisions
70.9%
grant rate
MGM
992 decisions
65.9%
grant rate
KHS
897 decisions
86.8%
grant rate
TAH
829 decisions
69.4%
grant rate
DBC
789 decisions
70.2%
grant rate
DML
750 decisions
61.5%
grant rate
LRJ
748 decisions
47.3%
grant rate
RCJ
732 decisions
77.9%
grant rate
KBJ
703 decisions
88.8%
grant rate
PHE
690 decisions
32.3%
grant rate
AJB
647 decisions
71.6%
grant rate
MKN
633 decisions
64.0%
grant rate
BTR
597 decisions
82.2%
grant rate
RRA
544 decisions
64.9%
grant rate
BC2
535 decisions
64.3%
grant rate
BTP
498 decisions
74.9%
grant rate
SAH
464 decisions
90.9%
grant rate
VSM
458 decisions
95.2%
grant rate
FHR
360 decisions
80.0%
grant rate
KFL
349 decisions
95.7%
grant rate
JBE
347 decisions
95.1%
grant rate
WSL
346 decisions
92.5%
grant rate
FTP
329 decisions
98.2%
grant rate
DL
319 decisions
53.9%
grant rate
X01
312 decisions
32.7%
grant rate
RTD
296 decisions
88.2%
grant rate
MJS
289 decisions
63.3%
grant rate
X03
284 decisions
31.0%
grant rate
FPO
275 decisions
55.3%
grant rate
DNO
273 decisions
39.2%
grant rate
X02
269 decisions
40.1%
grant rate
X05
259 decisions
42.9%
grant rate
X04
256 decisions
45.3%
grant rate
JAN
236 decisions
69.9%
grant rate
MEH
226 decisions
49.6%
grant rate
DHG
196 decisions
89.8%
grant rate
DHO
191 decisions
81.7%
grant rate
KAW
188 decisions
80.3%
grant rate
LGN
174 decisions
75.9%
grant rate
MLS
174 decisions
92.5%
grant rate
ATP
173 decisions
72.3%
grant rate
SJC
153 decisions
79.7%
grant rate
WRU
151 decisions
66.2%
grant rate
MEC
149 decisions
79.2%
grant rate
JMN
146 decisions
53.4%
grant rate
MGC
138 decisions
82.6%
grant rate
IMY
137 decisions
94.9%
grant rate
AWS
136 decisions
91.2%
grant rate
JOC
135 decisions
70.4%
grant rate
RML
134 decisions
74.6%
grant rate
SFA
131 decisions
88.5%
grant rate
ADL
130 decisions
73.8%
grant rate
CMK
130 decisions
54.6%
grant rate
BRC
129 decisions
58.9%
grant rate
DMP
124 decisions
76.6%
grant rate
DHF
121 decisions
64.5%
grant rate
LLG
118 decisions
64.4%
grant rate
SEB
116 decisions
36.2%
grant rate
BAT
110 decisions
97.3%
grant rate
LLM
110 decisions
66.4%
grant rate
GYH
110 decisions
90.9%
grant rate
JVJ
100 decisions
18.0%
grant rate

Year-by-Year Trends

FY Cases Grant %
2015 2,606 66.1%
2016 2,747 55.7%
2017 3,346 52.9%
2018 3,591 56.7%
2019 6,939 59.1%
2020 4,246 56.8%
2021 1,387 65.7%
2022 2,028 58.0%
2023 6,150 76.0%
2024 10,215 71.6%
2025 11,257 70.0%

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the grant rate at the JNA immigration court?
The JNA immigration court has an overall grant rate of 65.2% and a denial rate of 1.5%, based on 54,512 total cases from DOJ EOIR records.
How many immigration judges serve at JNA?
JNA has 76 immigration judges on record. Grant rates vary significantly between judges — from 18.0% to 98.2%.
Where is the JNA immigration court located?
The JNA immigration court is located in , . It is part of the DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) system.
Does the grant rate predict my case outcome at JNA?
No. Grant rates are historical averages reflecting aggregate outcomes across all case types and judges. Individual outcomes depend on the specific facts of each case, the judge assigned, the type of relief sought, and whether you have legal representation. Always consult a licensed immigration attorney.
How has the JNA grant rate changed over time?
Between FY2015 and FY2025, the grant rate at JNA increased from 66.1% to 70.0%. Year-by-year data is shown in the trends table above.

Explore PlainImmigration

Data from the DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) via FOIA bulk case data. Statistical information only — not legal advice.

Related

Source: U.S. EOIR — Immigration Court Statistics Immigration court outcomes by court and case type · 2025