Immigration judge · LaSalle Immigration Court (Jena)

Immigration Judge JOC

According to the DOJ EOIR FOIA release (vintage 2026-08), signature read: 61 merits decisions make Judge JOC a thin-volume IJ code in the FOIA release. Grant rate sits mid-corpus at 31.1% (below the 48.3% national average).

Data updated 2026-09-05

31.1%
Asylum grant rate
68.9%
Asylum denial rate
61
Asylum decisions

Judge JOC in one line

Judge JOC's asylum grant rate is 31.1% (mid-band grant rate, below the 48.3% national average) across 61 FY2015-2025 merits decisions (thin-corpus volume).

31.1%
Asylum grant rate · Mid-band grant rate
61
Merits decisions · Thin-corpus volume
-17.2 pp
vs. national average
View watchlist

"JOC" is the anonymized judge code DOJ's Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) assigns in its public case-data release, not a verified public identity. EOIR does not publish immigration judges' full names in this dataset, so this code should not be read as confirming, or attributing these statistics to, any specific named individual. See our methodology for detail.

Statistical data only. Judge JOC's 68.9% denial-leaning history often tracks case mix and representation gaps, not a forecast for a future merits hearing. Consult a licensed immigration attorney.

Judge JOC vs all tracked IJs by asylum grant rate

Where this judge's FY2015–2025 asylum grant rate sits among every tracked immigration judge (a leniency measure, not a quality ranking)

31.1% 1080th of 1696 higher than 616 of 1,696 judges

Immigration judges, banded by asylum grant rate

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more judges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source DOJ EOIR asylum merits decisions · FY2015–2025

Year-by-Year Outcomes

Historical asylum merits decisions for this anonymized EOIR judge code. Annual rows can be thin, and are not a forecast of any future case.

FY Decisions Grants Denials Grant %
2020 60 18 42 30.0%
2021 1 1 0 100.0%

IJ rate-band chamber

Anonymized codes nearest Judge JOC's grant rate

EOIR publishes immigration judges as three-letter codes, not names. This chamber lists nationwide IJs whose asylum grant rate is closest to 31.1% (ABS gap), with a merits-volume stamp so volume is visible without a second identical card grid.

1,695 other immigration judges nationwide have a tracked asylum grant rate; the 6 closest matches to Judge JOC are shown here.

IJ Grant Δ vs here Merits Stamp Court
JER 31.1% same 1,017 FULL Santa Ana
JEL 31.1% same 453 LIGHT Hyattsville
IEG 31.1% same 45 THIN Otero
EJT 31.2% +0.1 pp 202 LIGHT Pearsall
JN 31.2% +0.1 pp 48 THIN Port Isabel
PSL 31.2% +0.1 pp 32 THIN Otay Mesa

Same-bench poles at LaSalle

Same-bench spread at LaSalle: Judge JOC runs 31.1% - below the 48.3% national average among IJs with at least 20 merits here.

Nationwide judges with similar asylum caseload

Other thin-volume IJ codes nationwide, caseload peers when merits counts sit below the corpus median.

  • IJ AAS · Tacoma Immigration Court · 61 merits · 29.5% grant
  • IJ DGT · Harlingen Immigration Court · 61 merits · 42.6% grant
  • IJ ICF · Tucson Immigration Court · 61 merits · 42.6% grant
  • IJ AGL · Hartford Immigration Court · 61 merits · 44.3% grant

Data from DOJ EOIR FOIA bulk case data for Judge JOC at LaSalle Immigration Court (Jena). Statistical information only, not legal advice.

DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) FOIA bulk case data for IJ JOC at LaSalle Immigration Court (Jena); merits-decision volume 61. PlainImmigration computed grant/denial aggregates FY2015–FY2025; Merits volume is thin-corpus at 61 decisions FY2015–2025.

Judge JOC's figures are computed from EOIR case-level records - merits-decision volume 61, not hand-typed editorial values. justice.gov/eoir/foia-library-0

Every figure on PlainImmigration is rendered directly from federal immigration court records, no number is typed in by an editor. Judge JOC's grant/denial/merits figures are recomputed live from the EOIR case-level extract on every request, never hand-typed. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-09-05.