Immigration judge · LaSalle Immigration Court (Jena)

Immigration Judge JAM

According to the DOJ EOIR FOIA release (vintage 2026-08), signature read: denial rate 91.1% is Judge JAM's most extreme outcome share in the corpus. Grant rate sits in the lower third of tracked IJs at 8.9% (below the 48.3% national average). Merits volume is mid-band at 271 decisions FY2015–2025.

Data updated 2026-09-05

8.9%
Asylum grant rate
91.1%
Asylum denial rate
271
Asylum decisions

Judge JAM in one line

Judge JAM's asylum grant rate is 8.9% (lower-third grant rate, below the 48.3% national average) across 271 FY2015-2025 merits decisions (mid-band volume).

8.9%
Asylum grant rate · Lower-third grant rate
271
Merits decisions · Mid-band volume
-39.4 pp
vs. national average
View watchlist

"JAM" is the anonymized judge code DOJ's Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) assigns in its public case-data release, not a verified public identity. EOIR does not publish immigration judges' full names in this dataset, so this code should not be read as confirming, or attributing these statistics to, any specific named individual. See our methodology for detail.

Statistical data only. Judge JAM's 91.1% denial-leaning history often tracks case mix and representation gaps, not a forecast for a future merits hearing. Consult a licensed immigration attorney.

Judge JAM vs all tracked IJs by asylum grant rate

Where this judge's FY2015–2025 asylum grant rate sits among every tracked immigration judge (a leniency measure, not a quality ranking)

8.9% 1579th of 1696 higher than 117 of 1,696 judges

Immigration judges, banded by asylum grant rate

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more judges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source DOJ EOIR asylum merits decisions · FY2015–2025

Year-by-Year Outcomes

Historical asylum merits decisions for this anonymized EOIR judge code. Annual rows can be thin, and are not a forecast of any future case.

FY Decisions Grants Denials Grant %
2020 2 0 2 0.0%
2023 56 4 52 7.1%
2024 17 1 16 5.9%
2025 196 19 177 9.7%

IJ rate-band chamber

Anonymized codes nearest Judge JAM's grant rate

This chamber tracks nationwide IJs nearest Judge JAM's 8.9% grant rate, a lower-third corpus rate, with THIN/LIGHT/FULL/HEAVY merits stamps on each peer row.

1,695 other immigration judges nationwide have a tracked asylum grant rate; the 6 closest matches to Judge JAM are shown here.

IJ Grant Δ vs here Merits Stamp Court
RPL 8.9% same 428 LIGHT Port Isabel
THW 8.9% same 158 LIGHT Elizabeth
JLM 9.0% +0.1 pp 144 LIGHT New York - Federal Plaza
DML 8.8% -0.1 pp 34 THIN LaSalle
BRC 9.1% +0.2 pp 66 THIN Buffalo
ASR 9.1% +0.2 pp 44 THIN Elizabeth

Same-bench poles at LaSalle

Same-bench spread at LaSalle: Judge JAM runs 8.9% - below the 48.3% national average among IJs with at least 20 merits here.

Nationwide judges with similar asylum caseload

Immigration judges at other courts with a comparable merits-decision volume, distinct from same-bench grant-rate peers above.

  • IJ JGH · Charlotte Immigration Court · 270 merits · 17.4% grant
  • IJ RLF · Dallas Immigration Court · 270 merits · 33.0% grant
  • IJ RRW · Fort Snelling Immigration Court · 272 merits · 33.5% grant
  • IJ ANE · Boston Immigration Court · 270 merits · 38.9% grant

Lower-third grant-rate IJ code JAM (8.9%) in DOJ EOIR FOIA data. Statistical information only, not legal advice.

DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) FOIA bulk case data for IJ JAM at LaSalle Immigration Court (Jena); asylum denial rate 91.1%. PlainImmigration computed grant/denial aggregates FY2015–FY2025; Merits volume is mid-band at 271 decisions FY2015–2025.

Judge JAM's figures are computed from EOIR case-level records - asylum denial rate 91.1%, not hand-typed editorial values. justice.gov/eoir/foia-library-0

Every figure on PlainImmigration is rendered directly from federal immigration court records, no number is typed in by an editor. Judge JAM's grant/denial/merits figures are recomputed live from the EOIR case-level extract on every request, never hand-typed. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-09-05.