Courts
2024 data Public-data reference. official source

CIC

Open-data reference.

, · DOJ EOIR Immigration Court

Statistical data only. Grant rates reflect historical case outcomes and are not predictive of any individual case result. Consult a licensed immigration attorney for legal advice.

Case Insights: CIC

The CIC immigration court, based in , , has processed 81,100 recorded cases in the DOJ EOIR dataset. Of those, 52,371 resulted in relief granted (64.6%), 1,116 were denied (1.4%), and 27,613 fell into other dispositions such as administrative closures, changes of venue, or withdrawals (34.0%). The court has 68 immigration judges on record, whose individual caseloads and outcome patterns shape the court-wide averages shown above.

Between fiscal year 2015 and fiscal year 2025, the grant rate at CIC rose by 7.0 percentage points, moving from 63.3% to 70.3%. That window spans 11 fiscal years of reported data, covering shifts in bench composition, policy guidance, and nationality mix. The year-by-year table lower on this page shows the underlying annual case volume for every year in the series.

Outcomes vary substantially judge-to-judge. Judge LLU has the largest recorded caseload at 6,590 decisions (62.2% grant rate). The spread between the highest-grant and lowest-grant judges at this court is 85.1 percentage points — JSI at 99.1% versus X14 at 14.0%. These differences reflect case mix, nationality assignments, and docket type rather than any single factor, and they are why EOIR cautions readers against treating any judge's rate as predictive of an individual case.

64.6%
Grant Rate
1.4%
Denial Rate
0 mo
Avg Wait Time
81,100
Total Cases

Case Outcomes at CIC — Distribution of 81,100 total cases

Grants52371Denials1116Other27613
Case Outcomes at CIC — Distribution of 81,100 total cases

Grant Rate

64.6% of cases

Decided cases at CIC

Avg Wait Time

0 months

From NTA to decision

Total Decisions

81,100

All completed cases

Court Grant Rate vs. National Average 64.6%

64.6% of cases granted relief at CIC

Judges (68)

LLU
6,590 decisions
62.2%
grant rate
RPL
6,353 decisions
68.4%
grant rate
MES
6,204 decisions
55.4%
grant rate
SEG
6,071 decisions
57.1%
grant rate
RW
5,910 decisions
52.2%
grant rate
BSP
5,607 decisions
56.4%
grant rate
CBA
5,357 decisions
63.2%
grant rate
HDA
4,161 decisions
58.2%
grant rate
TMC
3,373 decisions
62.2%
grant rate
JNM
2,352 decisions
86.0%
grant rate
AJC
1,923 decisions
75.8%
grant rate
ADC
1,720 decisions
66.1%
grant rate
JAM
1,160 decisions
70.9%
grant rate
MGC
1,112 decisions
96.6%
grant rate
HRG
1,026 decisions
74.9%
grant rate
DKT
962 decisions
38.5%
grant rate
RCJ
960 decisions
76.8%
grant rate
BC2
892 decisions
72.4%
grant rate
GWR
821 decisions
69.7%
grant rate
BLH
800 decisions
80.9%
grant rate
DL
774 decisions
80.7%
grant rate
JGC
753 decisions
75.0%
grant rate
RDM
728 decisions
73.2%
grant rate
KFL
693 decisions
81.8%
grant rate
JBE
670 decisions
85.5%
grant rate
KC
563 decisions
78.9%
grant rate
RLF
443 decisions
91.2%
grant rate
CRC
392 decisions
63.5%
grant rate
CNM
386 decisions
56.7%
grant rate
CTN
373 decisions
78.6%
grant rate
JAN
365 decisions
74.8%
grant rate
MKN
308 decisions
78.2%
grant rate
VPG
284 decisions
30.6%
grant rate
BQN
277 decisions
86.6%
grant rate
CNP
269 decisions
87.0%
grant rate
SSL
260 decisions
90.0%
grant rate
X32
256 decisions
53.1%
grant rate
SME
256 decisions
77.7%
grant rate
JSI
232 decisions
99.1%
grant rate
X30
231 decisions
38.1%
grant rate
PJE
219 decisions
44.7%
grant rate
X31
213 decisions
41.3%
grant rate
FSM
208 decisions
78.8%
grant rate
DER
202 decisions
88.1%
grant rate
JN
194 decisions
89.7%
grant rate
DWE
189 decisions
65.6%
grant rate
RRO
181 decisions
93.4%
grant rate
JRD
176 decisions
29.0%
grant rate
JCS
173 decisions
63.6%
grant rate
X13
172 decisions
20.9%
grant rate
RML
165 decisions
91.5%
grant rate
BTR
157 decisions
89.2%
grant rate
AJB
150 decisions
87.3%
grant rate
GET
145 decisions
75.9%
grant rate
GMP
145 decisions
82.8%
grant rate
LRS
138 decisions
79.0%
grant rate
KHS
138 decisions
80.4%
grant rate
KWS
135 decisions
61.5%
grant rate
EBW
131 decisions
62.6%
grant rate
AVP
126 decisions
64.3%
grant rate
DHF
118 decisions
78.0%
grant rate
JG
114 decisions
91.2%
grant rate
MUN
114 decisions
76.3%
grant rate
NB
110 decisions
56.4%
grant rate
BHA
107 decisions
78.5%
grant rate
X14
107 decisions
14.0%
grant rate
LWA
102 decisions
97.1%
grant rate
FGL
101 decisions
51.5%
grant rate

Year-by-Year Trends

FY Cases Grant %
2015 5,288 63.3%
2016 6,248 57.2%
2017 7,519 58.9%
2018 8,402 60.0%
2019 10,764 56.2%
2020 5,504 63.8%
2021 3,052 67.0%
2022 4,455 56.7%
2023 9,105 70.6%
2024 8,936 79.5%
2025 11,827 70.3%

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the grant rate at the CIC immigration court?
The CIC immigration court has an overall grant rate of 64.6% and a denial rate of 1.4%, based on 81,100 total cases from DOJ EOIR records.
How many immigration judges serve at CIC?
CIC has 68 immigration judges on record. Grant rates vary significantly between judges — from 14.0% to 99.1%.
Where is the CIC immigration court located?
The CIC immigration court is located in , . It is part of the DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) system.
Does the grant rate predict my case outcome at CIC?
No. Grant rates are historical averages reflecting aggregate outcomes across all case types and judges. Individual outcomes depend on the specific facts of each case, the judge assigned, the type of relief sought, and whether you have legal representation. Always consult a licensed immigration attorney.
How has the CIC grant rate changed over time?
Between FY2015 and FY2025, the grant rate at CIC increased from 63.3% to 70.3%. Year-by-year data is shown in the trends table above.

Explore PlainImmigration

Data from the DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) via FOIA bulk case data. Statistical information only — not legal advice.

Related

Source: U.S. EOIR — Immigration Court Statistics Immigration court outcomes by court and case type · 2025