Immigration judge · Conroe Immigration Court

Immigration Judge JAM

According to the DOJ EOIR FOIA release (vintage 2026-08), signature read: denial rate 85.8% is Judge JAM's most extreme outcome share in the corpus. Grant rate sits in the lower third of tracked IJs at 14.2% (below the 48.3% national average). Merits volume is mid-band at 148 decisions FY2015–2025.

Data updated 2026-09-05

14.2%
Asylum grant rate
85.8%
Asylum denial rate
148
Asylum decisions

Judge JAM in one line

Judge JAM's asylum grant rate is 14.2% (lower-third grant rate, below the 48.3% national average) across 148 FY2015-2025 merits decisions (mid-band volume).

14.2%
Asylum grant rate · Lower-third grant rate
148
Merits decisions · Mid-band volume
-34.1 pp
vs. national average
View watchlist

"JAM" is the anonymized judge code DOJ's Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) assigns in its public case-data release, not a verified public identity. EOIR does not publish immigration judges' full names in this dataset, so this code should not be read as confirming, or attributing these statistics to, any specific named individual. See our methodology for detail.

Statistical data only. Judge JAM's 85.8% denial-leaning history often tracks case mix and representation gaps, not a forecast for a future merits hearing. Consult a licensed immigration attorney.

Judge JAM vs all tracked IJs by asylum grant rate

Where this judge's FY2015–2025 asylum grant rate sits among every tracked immigration judge (a leniency measure, not a quality ranking)

14.2% 1483rd of 1696 higher than 213 of 1,696 judges

Immigration judges, banded by asylum grant rate

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more judges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source DOJ EOIR asylum merits decisions · FY2015–2025

Year-by-Year Outcomes

Historical asylum merits decisions for this anonymized EOIR judge code. Annual rows can be thin, and are not a forecast of any future case.

FY Decisions Grants Denials Grant %
2019 69 6 63 8.7%
2020 66 12 54 18.2%
2021 8 1 7 12.5%
2022 1 0 1 0.0%
2023 2 1 1 50.0%
2024 2 1 1 50.0%

IJ rate-band chamber

Anonymized codes nearest Judge JAM's grant rate

This chamber tracks nationwide IJs nearest Judge JAM's 14.2% grant rate, a lower-third corpus rate, with THIN/LIGHT/FULL/HEAVY merits stamps on each peer row.

1,695 other immigration judges nationwide have a tracked asylum grant rate; the 6 closest matches to Judge JAM are shown here.

IJ Grant Δ vs here Merits Stamp Court
SFA 14.2% same 141 LIGHT Buffalo
PMT 14.1% -0.1 pp 249 LIGHT Portland
SSL 14.1% -0.1 pp 78 THIN Port Isabel
KQG 14.3% +0.1 pp 161 LIGHT Philadelphia
JDV 14.3% +0.1 pp 91 THIN Tacoma
DM 14.3% +0.1 pp 35 THIN Omaha

Same-bench poles at Conroe

Same-bench spread at Conroe: Judge JAM runs 14.2% - below the 48.3% national average among IJs with at least 20 merits here.

Nationwide judges with similar asylum caseload

Immigration judges at other courts with a comparable merits-decision volume, distinct from same-bench grant-rate peers above.

  • IJ DLC · Laredo Immigration Court · 148 merits · 14.9% grant
  • IJ SNS · Charlotte Immigration Court · 148 merits · 16.2% grant
  • IJ NHT · Florence Immigration Court · 148 merits · 16.9% grant
  • IJ DH · Elizabeth Immigration Court · 148 merits · 68.9% grant

Lower-third grant-rate IJ code JAM (14.2%) in DOJ EOIR FOIA data. Statistical information only, not legal advice.

DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) FOIA bulk case data for IJ JAM at Conroe Immigration Court; asylum denial rate 85.8%. PlainImmigration computed grant/denial aggregates FY2015–FY2025; Merits volume is mid-band at 148 decisions FY2015–2025.

Judge JAM's figures are computed from EOIR case-level records - asylum denial rate 85.8%, not hand-typed editorial values. justice.gov/eoir/foia-library-0

Every figure on PlainImmigration is rendered directly from federal immigration court records, no number is typed in by an editor. Judge JAM's grant/denial/merits figures are recomputed live from the EOIR case-level extract on every request, never hand-typed. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-09-05.