Immigration judge · Harlingen Immigration Court

Immigration Judge JAM

According to the DOJ EOIR FOIA release (vintage 2026-08), signature read: 64 merits decisions make Judge JAM a thin-volume IJ code in the FOIA release. Grant rate sits in the lower third of tracked IJs at 28.1% (below the 48.3% national average). Merits volume is thin-corpus at 64 decisions FY2015–2025.

Data updated 2026-09-05

28.1%
Asylum grant rate
71.9%
Asylum denial rate
64
Asylum decisions

Judge JAM in one line

Judge JAM's asylum grant rate is 28.1% (lower-third grant rate, below the 48.3% national average) across 64 FY2015-2025 merits decisions (thin-corpus volume).

28.1%
Asylum grant rate · Lower-third grant rate
64
Merits decisions · Thin-corpus volume
-20.2 pp
vs. national average
View watchlist

"JAM" is the anonymized judge code DOJ's Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) assigns in its public case-data release, not a verified public identity. EOIR does not publish immigration judges' full names in this dataset, so this code should not be read as confirming, or attributing these statistics to, any specific named individual. See our methodology for detail.

Statistical data only. Judge JAM's 71.9% denial-leaning history often tracks case mix and representation gaps, not a forecast for a future merits hearing. Consult a licensed immigration attorney.

Judge JAM vs all tracked IJs by asylum grant rate

Where this judge's FY2015–2025 asylum grant rate sits among every tracked immigration judge (a leniency measure, not a quality ranking)

28.1% 1162nd of 1696 higher than 534 of 1,696 judges

Immigration judges, banded by asylum grant rate

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more judges. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source DOJ EOIR asylum merits decisions · FY2015–2025

Year-by-Year Outcomes

Historical asylum merits decisions for this anonymized EOIR judge code. Annual rows can be thin, and are not a forecast of any future case.

FY Decisions Grants Denials Grant %
2020 1 0 1 0.0%
2022 62 18 44 29.0%
2023 1 0 1 0.0%

IJ rate-band chamber

Anonymized codes nearest Judge JAM's grant rate

This chamber tracks nationwide IJs nearest Judge JAM's 28.1% grant rate, a lower-third corpus rate, with THIN/LIGHT/FULL/HEAVY merits stamps on each peer row.

1,695 other immigration judges nationwide have a tracked asylum grant rate; the 6 closest matches to Judge JAM are shown here.

IJ Grant Δ vs here Merits Stamp Court
SEG 28.1% same 1,408 FULL Houston - Smith Street
JMN 28.1% same 32 THIN Buffalo
RJA 28.2% +0.1 pp 692 FULL Memphis
AKP 28.2% +0.1 pp 124 LIGHT Los Angeles - West
EBS 28.2% +0.1 pp 39 THIN Houston - Smith Street
CB1 28.0% -0.1 pp 446 LIGHT Miami

Same-bench poles at Harlingen

Same-bench spread at Harlingen: Judge JAM runs 28.1% - below the 48.3% national average among IJs with at least 20 merits here.

Nationwide judges with similar asylum caseload

Other thin-volume IJ codes nationwide, caseload peers when merits counts sit below the corpus median.

  • IJ CNM · Pearsall Immigration Court · 64 merits · 21.9% grant
  • IJ LWP · Concord Immigration Court · 64 merits · 62.5% grant
  • IJ AAB · Annandale Immigration Court · 64 merits · 78.1% grant
  • IJ PJE · San Juan Immigration Court · 64 merits · 81.2% grant

Lower-third grant-rate IJ code JAM (28.1%) in DOJ EOIR FOIA data. Statistical information only, not legal advice.

DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) FOIA bulk case data for IJ JAM at Harlingen Immigration Court; merits-decision volume 64. PlainImmigration computed grant/denial aggregates FY2015–FY2025; Merits volume is thin-corpus at 64 decisions FY2015–2025.

Judge JAM's figures are computed from EOIR case-level records - merits-decision volume 64, not hand-typed editorial values. justice.gov/eoir/foia-library-0

Every figure on PlainImmigration is rendered directly from federal immigration court records, no number is typed in by an editor. Judge JAM's grant/denial/merits figures are recomputed live from the EOIR case-level extract on every request, never hand-typed. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-09-05.