Asylum Grant Rate
49.4% of merits decisions
Asylum cases decided at Harlingen Immigration Court
Immigration court · Harlingen, TX
49.4% asylum grant rate across 4,552 merits decisions (FY2015–2025) - roughly in line with the 48.2% national average.
Data updated 2026-06-21
The verdict
The Harlingen Immigration Court granted asylum in 49.4% of the 4,552 cases it decided on the merits - roughly in line with the 48.2% national rate.
The Harlingen Immigration Court, based in Harlingen, TX, decided 4,552 asylum cases on the merits between FY2015 and FY2025 - out of 363,013 total proceedings of all case types it handled. Of those asylum decisions, 2,248 were granted (49.4%) and 2,304 were denied (50.6%). The court has 27 immigration judges with enough asylum decisions to report, whose individual grant rates shape the court-wide average shown above.
Between fiscal year 2015 and fiscal year 2025, the grant rate at Harlingen Immigration Court fell by 21.1 percentage points, moving from 81.1% to 60.0%. That window spans 11 fiscal years of reported data, covering shifts in bench composition, policy guidance, and nationality mix. The year-by-year table lower on this page shows the underlying annual case volume for every year in the series.
Outcomes vary substantially judge-to-judge. Judge DIG decided the most asylum cases here - 557 merits decisions (54.8% grant rate). The spread between the highest-grant and lowest-grant judges at this court is 75.4 percentage points - ET at 94.8% versus SSL at 19.4%. These differences reflect case mix, nationality assignments, and docket type rather than any single factor, and they are why EOIR cautions readers against treating any judge's rate as predictive of an individual case.
Asylum Grant Rate
49.4% of merits decisions
Asylum cases decided at Harlingen Immigration Court
Pending Cases
7,242
Open proceedings (all case types)
Asylum Decisions
4,552
Merits decisions, FY2015–2025
Asylum grant rate by fiscal year at Harlingen Immigration Court.
| Fiscal year | Decisions | Grant rate |
|---|---|---|
| FY2015 | 169 | 81.1% |
| FY2016 | 261 | 88.1% |
| FY2017 | 339 | 84.4% |
| FY2018 | 181 | 43.6% |
| FY2019 | 269 | 37.2% |
| FY2020 | 1,501 | 26.9% |
| FY2021 | 445 | 67.0% |
| FY2022 | 586 | 42.5% |
| FY2023 | 313 | 56.5% |
| FY2024 | 218 | 57.8% |
| FY2025 | 270 | 60.0% |
27 judges with enough asylum decisions to report. Grant rates run from 94.8% (58 decisions) down to 19.4% (180 decisions) - a 75.4-point spread on the same bench. Rates based on smaller decision counts carry more statistical noise.
Judge names below are the anonymized judge codes EOIR assigns in its public case-data release, not verified public identities. EOIR does not publish immigration judges' full names in this dataset. See our methodology for detail.
| # | Judge | Decisions | Asylum grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Judge ET | 58 | |
| 2 | Judge HEA | 432 | |
| 3 | Judge DA | 302 | |
| 4 | Judge FTP | 149 | |
| 5 | Judge SC3 | 176 | |
| 6 | Judge BC2 | 80 | |
| 7 | Judge CB1 | 108 | |
| 8 | Judge JBE | 48 | |
| 9 | Judge MJG | 168 | |
| 10 | Judge JTL | 383 | |
| 11 | Judge DIG | 557 | |
| 12 | Judge JNC | 341 | |
| 13 | Judge CRP | 33 | |
| 14 | Judge MKB | 126 | |
| 15 | Judge DGT | 61 | |
| 16 | Judge WLA | 39 | |
| 17 | Judge PHE | 82 | |
| 18 | Judge KFL | 92 | |
| 19 | Judge BLH | 44 | |
| 20 | Judge DHF | 209 | |
| 21 | Judge SME | 122 | |
| 22 | Judge JAM | 63 | |
| 23 | Judge MIO | 100 | |
| 24 | Judge JGC | 196 | |
| 25 | Judge MUN | 92 | |
| 26 | Judge MTG | 140 | |
| 27 | Judge SSL | 180 | |
Data from the DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) via FOIA bulk case data. Statistical information only, not legal advice.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Source: U.S. EOIR, Immigration Court Statistics Immigration court outcomes by court and case type · 2025
Every figure on PlainImmigration is rendered directly from federal immigration court records, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on DOJ EOIR case-level records, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.