Immigration Court Rankings
Compare US immigration courts and judges across grant rate, backlog, and caseload. Every ranking is computed directly from DOJ EOIR FOIA case data. Statistical only, not legal advice: outcomes depend on facts specific to each case; consult a licensed immigration attorney or accredited representative for guidance on your situation.
Ranking categories
Highest Grant Rate Courts
Courts with the highest proportion of approved cases
Lowest Grant Rate Courts
Courts with the highest proportion of denied cases
Longest Court Backlogs
Courts with the longest average wait times
Highest Caseload Judges
Judges who have decided the most cases
Judge Grant Rate Comparison
Judges ranked by grant rate, from most to least permissive
Highest grant rate courts (preview)
- New York - Federal Plaza Immigration Court - 74.9% grants
- Sacramento Immigration Court - 74.8% grants
- San Francisco Immigration Court - 72.2% grants
- Concord Immigration Court - 68.6% grants
- Honolulu Immigration Court - 63.8% grants
- Los Angeles - Van Nuys Boulevard Immigration Court - 62.9% grants
- Chicago Immigration Court - 61.5% grants
- Salt Lake City Immigration Court - 55.9% grants
- Philadelphia Immigration Court - 55.4% grants
- Hyattsville Immigration Court - 54.8% grants
Lowest grant rate courts (preview)
- Port Isabel Immigration Court (Detained) - 12.1% grants
- Atlanta - Ted Turner Drive Immigration Court - 14.3% grants
- Stewart Immigration Court - 14.6% grants
- El Paso Service Processing Center Immigration Court - 16.4% grants
- Port Isabel Immigration Court - 16.7% grants
- LaSalle Immigration Court (Jena) - 18.9% grants
- Batavia Immigration Court - 19.0% grants
- Miami - Krome Immigration Court - 19.8% grants
- Conroe Immigration Court - 19.9% grants
- Adelanto Immigration Court - 20.6% grants
Longest backlog courts (preview)
- Los Angeles - West Immigration Court - 47 mo avg wait
- Annandale Immigration Court - 42 mo avg wait
- Chelmsford Immigration Court (Detained) - 40 mo avg wait
- San Francisco Immigration Court - 40 mo avg wait
- Baltimore Immigration Court - 40 mo avg wait
- Sterling Immigration Court - 40 mo avg wait
- Omaha Immigration Court - 39 mo avg wait
- New York - Federal Plaza Immigration Court - 39 mo avg wait
- Boston Immigration Court - 39 mo avg wait
- Newark Immigration Court - 39 mo avg wait
How PlainImmigration Rankings Are Compiled
Our rankings are computed directly from the upstream DOJ EOIR FOIA dataset, not editorially curated and not influenced by advertisers. Each ranking surfaces a clear, reproducible metric (for example, share of granted cases per court, average wait time in months, count of cases decided per judge), and the underlying numbers are visible on the associated court and judge pages so you can verify them. We recompute rankings whenever the upstream data refreshes, and we publish the refresh cadence on the methodology page.
What Rankings Mean (and What They Do Not)
A ranking is a useful lens, it tells you where to start looking, but it is not a judgment about a judge's competence or a court's fairness. Being at the top of a grant-rate ranking does not mean a court is "better," and being at the bottom does not mean a court is "worse." Outcomes reflect the mix of case types, nationalities, legal representation rates, and individual judicial philosophies a given court handles. Wherever a ranking could be misread as a quality claim, we include an explanatory note on the page. When a ranking is rate-based (grants per total decisions, months to first hearing), we describe the denominator so you can sanity-check whether the normalization fits your question.
Why We Publish These Rankings
Rankings make large public datasets navigable. Most visitors arrive with a question ("Which immigration court has the longest backlog?" or "Where do grant rates concentrate?") and benefit from seeing a ranked list with direct links to the full court and judge records. Publishing ranked views of public data is a long-established practice in civic journalism; we are careful to surface the raw numbers, link to the official EOIR source, and avoid editorial spin. If a ranking ever implies a value judgment not supported by the data, please email us at the address on the contact page and we will review the wording.
Methodology, Sources, and Corrections
Every ranking is derived from the source dataset linked on the methodology page. We do not blend proprietary signals; we do not substitute editor opinion for data. If you believe a ranking is miscomputed or that a record is misclassified, please contact us with the specific record ID and the expected correction, and we will investigate within the next refresh cycle. Corrections that affect the published ranking are rolled forward immediately; minor formatting fixes go out with the next scheduled refresh.
Underlying Source
Raw case-level data comes from the US Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), released periodically via FOIA. Each row in our database corresponds to a single decision; aggregations (grant rate, denial rate, average wait) are computed on the full set of decisions for the cohort you are viewing. See the methodology page for the exact computation and exclusions.
Every figure on PlainImmigration is rendered directly from federal immigration court records, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on DOJ EOIR immigration court case data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.